XML Signer Extension
Are you looking for a reliable and efficient
Chrome extension
to help you generate XML signatures for reporting in the ESSO system? Well, you might want to steer clear of the Sanct um
extension
, which has received a disappointing rating of 1.53 out of 5. In this article, we will delve into the reasons behind this low rating and explain why you should avoid installing this app.
As with any software, user reviews offer valuable insights into its performance and usability. Unfortunately, the Sanct um
extension
has garnered a significant number of negative reviews, with users expressing frustrations over its functionality and reliability.
One user, Tatyana Gorshkova, reported encountering an error stating, "Signing error. To sign the electronic signature, you need to install the MSI package and
plugin
." Despite having all the necessary installations, Tatyana found that the required window did not open, rendering the
extension
useless.
Another user, Artem Deputy, expressed his disappointment, stating that it was impossible to send reports using the
extension
. This issue highlights a crucial flaw in the Sanct um
extension
, as the primary purpose of the software is to facilitate the submission of reports.
User complaints continue to pour in, with Angélica Ryásnáya stating that "nothing works" and Evgeniya Nosova criticizing the developers for providing programs and instructions that simply do not function properly.
Even the installation and instruction links provided by the developers seem to be broken, as pointed out by Nikolay Tanerov. This lack of
access
ibility and support further compounds the frustration experienced by users.
One user, Semen Yudin, encountered an error while attempting to send a report to the ESSO system, receiving a message that read, "Error sending reports." This ultimately led to a situation where the
extension
was rendered useless.
Alex Kovalenko summed up the overall sentiment by calling the Sanct um
extension
a "Russian non-intrusive service," suggesting that the
extension
fails to meet users' expectations.
Given the numerous complaints and negative experiences shared by users, it is evident that the Sanct um
extension
does not deliver on its promises. The inability to generate XML signatures, errors during the reporting process, broken links, and lack of response from the developers all contribute to a frustrating user experience.
In conclusion, we strongly advise against installing the Sanct um
extension
for XML signatures in the ESSO system. With a rating of 1.53 out of 5 and a plethora of user complaints, this
extension
falls far short of expectations. Instead, we recommend exploring alternative options that have garnered positive reviews and ratings, ensuring a seamless and hassle-free experience for your XML signature needs in the ESSO system.
